Bill Gates trying to vaccinate 90 percent egalite et reconciliation of the world's population. Who will live? Only smart people | New World Order | Croatia
HOME TERMS OF USE & ADVERTISING CONTACT NEWS TOPICS Croatia NEWS FROM THE FOLLOWING MONEY CRISIS WORLD IN WAR AND SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND MEDICINE FOOD WARNING! BOOKS AC DH IM NR S-Z Anonymous - Anonymous Surfing and paging ONLINE LEGAL NOTICE Our Domains MISCELLANEOUS EXCLUSIVE: Scenario of this decade CHEMTRAILS HAARP New World Order Who are the Illuminati? Masons egalite et reconciliation Illuminati
In a recent speech, Microsoft guru, a great humanitarian, philanthropist, put pressure on the governments of the world to "prevent four million deaths per year by 2015, ... ten million deaths" by 2020. He believes that this will happen if you are vaccinated at least 90% percent of the world's population.
Gates is an ardent supporter of vaccination for years. His organization, egalite et reconciliation the Foundation Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, constantly promotes vaccines anywhere egalite et reconciliation it can. Results Foundation, in fact say that one of his goals to vaccinate egalite et reconciliation every child on the planet, claiming that vaccines are "one egalite et reconciliation of the most effective health interventions ever developed."
However, among his numerous speeches, Gates gave conflicting information on the Agenda (agenda, hidden plan) behind his push for vaccination. In his recent speech, he claims that vaccines save lives. However, in his speech at the TED Conference in 2010, Gates made it clear that as vaccines and health only part of the equation to reduce the world's population by 15% percent.
"The egalite et reconciliation world today has 6.8 billion people ... that is slowly moving towards nine billion," he told his audience. "Now, if you do a very good job on new vaccines, health care, services egalite et reconciliation to play, we could reduce the population of perhaps ten or 15 percent."
So, what is it? Do vaccines help save lives or end lives? Since the vaccine packed with toxic chemical additives and chemical preservatives, which are known to cause serious egalite et reconciliation health problems, infertility, and even death, the latter conclusion seems to be a lot more sense Controversial TED Conference
The presentation TED Conference, Microsoft's billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars for new vaccines, spoke on the issue of CO2 emissions and its impact egalite et reconciliation on climate change. He presented a formula for monitoring CO2 emissions that looks: CO2 = P x S x E x C
Then he added that to get CO2 to zero "probably one of these numbers will have to come pretty close to zero." After that, Bill Gates began to describe to the first number - P (for people) - could be reduced. Reducing the world's population through vaccines
This statement Bill Gates is not imposed with hesitation, stuttering or other indicators that give out that he said something wrong. It seems that it is pronounced with the intention, calculated egalite et reconciliation as a part of a well developed and coherent presentation. egalite et reconciliation
Obviously, this statement implies that the vaccine methods reduce the population. Thus, the "Health", for which all readers already know that can be called "bolestvo", egalite et reconciliation actually more more people than it helps.
Maybe that's the whole point of it. Since the vaccine technology actually helps almost anyone from a scientific point of view, the question arises: What is the purpose that the vaccine being pushed so hard in the first place?
Bill Gates seems to have wanted to say that one of the main purposes of reducing the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. How does the vaccine can be used to reduce the world's population?
Let's spend a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are those that will be used to reduce the world's population, it obviously must be accepted by most people. Otherwise the effort of reducing the number of the population will not be very effective.
And how could it be accepted by most people, it obviously can not kill people directly. If everybody started dropping egalite et reconciliation dead within 24 hours of receipt of the vaccine, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly, and the vaccine would be revoked. So if vaccines are those that will be used as an effective reduction of the population, there are really only three ways in which it can theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who want to reduce the world's population:
# 2) It can reduce fertility and thus significantly lower birth rates in the world, thereby reducing egalite et reconciliation world population over successive generations. This method of "soft kill" may be more acceptable to scientists who want to see a drop in the world's population, but not quite have the stomach to directly kill people egalite et reconciliation with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines can cause abortions.
# 3) It can increase the rate of mortality in future egalite et reconciliation pandemics. Theoretically,
HOME TERMS OF USE & ADVERTISING CONTACT NEWS TOPICS Croatia NEWS FROM THE FOLLOWING MONEY CRISIS WORLD IN WAR AND SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND MEDICINE FOOD WARNING! BOOKS AC DH IM NR S-Z Anonymous - Anonymous Surfing and paging ONLINE LEGAL NOTICE Our Domains MISCELLANEOUS EXCLUSIVE: Scenario of this decade CHEMTRAILS HAARP New World Order Who are the Illuminati? Masons egalite et reconciliation Illuminati
In a recent speech, Microsoft guru, a great humanitarian, philanthropist, put pressure on the governments of the world to "prevent four million deaths per year by 2015, ... ten million deaths" by 2020. He believes that this will happen if you are vaccinated at least 90% percent of the world's population.
Gates is an ardent supporter of vaccination for years. His organization, egalite et reconciliation the Foundation Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, constantly promotes vaccines anywhere egalite et reconciliation it can. Results Foundation, in fact say that one of his goals to vaccinate egalite et reconciliation every child on the planet, claiming that vaccines are "one egalite et reconciliation of the most effective health interventions ever developed."
However, among his numerous speeches, Gates gave conflicting information on the Agenda (agenda, hidden plan) behind his push for vaccination. In his recent speech, he claims that vaccines save lives. However, in his speech at the TED Conference in 2010, Gates made it clear that as vaccines and health only part of the equation to reduce the world's population by 15% percent.
"The egalite et reconciliation world today has 6.8 billion people ... that is slowly moving towards nine billion," he told his audience. "Now, if you do a very good job on new vaccines, health care, services egalite et reconciliation to play, we could reduce the population of perhaps ten or 15 percent."
So, what is it? Do vaccines help save lives or end lives? Since the vaccine packed with toxic chemical additives and chemical preservatives, which are known to cause serious egalite et reconciliation health problems, infertility, and even death, the latter conclusion seems to be a lot more sense Controversial TED Conference
The presentation TED Conference, Microsoft's billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars for new vaccines, spoke on the issue of CO2 emissions and its impact egalite et reconciliation on climate change. He presented a formula for monitoring CO2 emissions that looks: CO2 = P x S x E x C
Then he added that to get CO2 to zero "probably one of these numbers will have to come pretty close to zero." After that, Bill Gates began to describe to the first number - P (for people) - could be reduced. Reducing the world's population through vaccines
This statement Bill Gates is not imposed with hesitation, stuttering or other indicators that give out that he said something wrong. It seems that it is pronounced with the intention, calculated egalite et reconciliation as a part of a well developed and coherent presentation. egalite et reconciliation
Obviously, this statement implies that the vaccine methods reduce the population. Thus, the "Health", for which all readers already know that can be called "bolestvo", egalite et reconciliation actually more more people than it helps.
Maybe that's the whole point of it. Since the vaccine technology actually helps almost anyone from a scientific point of view, the question arises: What is the purpose that the vaccine being pushed so hard in the first place?
Bill Gates seems to have wanted to say that one of the main purposes of reducing the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. How does the vaccine can be used to reduce the world's population?
Let's spend a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are those that will be used to reduce the world's population, it obviously must be accepted by most people. Otherwise the effort of reducing the number of the population will not be very effective.
And how could it be accepted by most people, it obviously can not kill people directly. If everybody started dropping egalite et reconciliation dead within 24 hours of receipt of the vaccine, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly, and the vaccine would be revoked. So if vaccines are those that will be used as an effective reduction of the population, there are really only three ways in which it can theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who want to reduce the world's population:
# 2) It can reduce fertility and thus significantly lower birth rates in the world, thereby reducing egalite et reconciliation world population over successive generations. This method of "soft kill" may be more acceptable to scientists who want to see a drop in the world's population, but not quite have the stomach to directly kill people egalite et reconciliation with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines can cause abortions.
# 3) It can increase the rate of mortality in future egalite et reconciliation pandemics. Theoretically,
No comments:
Post a Comment