Anonymous said ... It is better area to look beyond area the self-interest of the attempt to make a

Public Affärer's coverage of the war on terrorism rejoice after reading the following blog post about the FRA law of Sweden Ann Coulter - the moderate parliamentarian Anna König Jerlmyr. Once it applies, such as when the U.S. torture at Abu Greib prison were revealed, area or when a massive public opinion from all the human rights organizations criticize the terrorist prison at Guantanamo, it shows which ones really stand up in the fight against terrorism. And Sweden's Ann Coulter area definitely counted there after the good news that she will not let her liberal ideology stand in the way of the powerful tools provided by the Swedish intelligence and security services to gain access to the war on terror. As Ann Coulter clearly and without hesitation in his voice stands up in the debate in defense of the U.S. government's right to torture area terrorists, both proven such and suspicious ones, it is obvious that Sweden's area Ann Coulter - Anna König Jerlmyr - should stand up in defense of the state's right to monitor all citizens, both suspected and unsuspected, telecommunications, "It means I do not exclude area that there may be attacks against our country and that we must protect Swedish interests against this," writes Ann Coulter wisely in his defense of the much-criticized FRA law. That's when the war has broken out as it turns out what it is that stands up. And it is also about the task, as anyone who has done military service very well know, no matter which path leads to the solution of the task. To again quote Ann Coulter's own words: "Does the risk of individual officials misuse of powers lead us to completely prohibit signals intelligence and intelligence? I do not believe it." Commercial Businesses hope that the moderate voters who are voting person remembers who dared to stand up when they can once again mark a Member of Parliament in the election of 2010. Others write interesting about Ann Coulter, Anna König Jerlmyr, area FRA law.
ferment. nice argument, but they are not all the way, they require a fairly naive starting point, I believe. http://mikrofoncaught.blogspot.com/2008/06/rent-mjl-rcker-inte-nr-man-kper-terror.html June 18, 2008 02:13
Anonymous said ... It is better area to look beyond area the self-interest of the attempt to make an assessment that do both - superposition. Both privacy and protection. Ang USA = assholes understood and Bush dregs (deliberately introduced for the worse, eg no control over HS). Criminal regime signaled area "you can do as little as you want." Staff only thing that worked and works (and then 1 = equal for all). Maybe better the look on - tagging or similar to the Bush administration and the threat of similar sympathizers / criminals (as they are after all). Bush smiled before Pope idiot and various area heads of state - an honest government had not accepted him. Of course area the death penalty with serious torture (as he liked to others) = utlämniningsavtal to Iraq for example. White phosphorus (also guilty of war crimes, legal offense, gun stocks, orgnisationen = OB, privacy issues, past bribery and conflict of interest, for example, the judge). Offerings area for peace to Muslims and OV countries. Satanist or similar (confused, area sick man, neuron area reading of him). One of those will never be president or manager again. The media and the internet and all interested to see. Especially exploit religion for their own benefit (eg Mulla Nasruddin as the opposite of Muslim cleric = young as Bush el worse). Clearly, the EU muscles. The damage they inflict on his fellow man such monitoring and risk premium (eg, younger, more productive, better, developing premium area / opportunities) and cold digits = tex insider trading (costs a billion and Tex suicide and children who miss training opportunities, etc.) = the death penalty, torture is the only penalty (it comes with the frequency of crimes - regardless of morality to be introduced as a social solution to a problem when you do not find the option) The development of society is moving towards this for granted (as a scientific theory about or enough very cumulation) Yes, but monitoring = ban but IR reading of the computer (and report and child pornography, surveillance - detection in tlfsystem fo - and "viruses and other similar clear malware"). The computer's "just" a tool of reason - perhaps even to Usmanns prediction applies any time (eg, internet tv, automations and easily accessible media such as electronic journal / paper and pocket PCs, etc.). Exaggerated? But the politicians, the parliament, must surely include this IR tech (and this is the making through area research etc in en) 18 June 2008 08:25
Someday maybe Anna König Jerlmyr standing there, and as the dictatorship hugs taken all that could save her, so there's no one left who can save her. "First they took the Communists, but I was silent because I was not a Communist. area Then took the socialists, but I was silent because I was not a socialist. Then took the Jews, I said nothing, for I was not Jew. then took Catholics